THE QUESTION
Why do people like filter bubbles?
Spend your stickers on what matters most. An idea with evidence can take a held seat.
closed · back to Actions
Viewing as guest. Enter a handle to join and take part.
Your sticker budget
One per idea, 7 total. Floor is one vote.
5 places are held for overlooked ideas — nominate one with a link, and it counts once 2 people agree the source is relevant.
why
At stage close one nominee enters by random draw and the rest by nomination count, at most one per stakeholder class. A model checks only whether the page is about the same subject — never whether it proves the claim. That judgement is the room's, and a nomination nobody else stands behind takes no seat.
CLUSTER 1
People I know now live in two different versions of the same country
12 votesdiscuss
Being wrong in front of people you know is worse than being wrong
Meaning the ordinary user, not the committed activist.
3 votesdiscuss
CLUSTER 2
People choose the sources that already agree with them
15 votesdiscuss
Correcting someone publicly makes them dig in harder
To be precise: this is about incentives, not anyone's character.
3 votesdiscuss
CLUSTER 3
Every platform is a private space that behaves like a public one
I would want evidence before I would call this a cause myself.
0 votesdiscuss
Public broadcasters are treated as one side rather than a floor
Scope: mainstream platforms, not niche forums.
0 votesdiscuss
NOT CLUSTERED
Twenty years ago the same complaint was made about television
0 votesdiscuss
Everyone assumes the other side is more extreme than it is
I would want evidence before I would call this a cause myself.
7 votesdiscuss
Nobody agrees on who should decide what is true
I mean this as an observation, not a proposal.
0 votesdiscussing (1)
Platforms are where politics happens, but nobody elected them
Scope: mainstream platforms, not niche forums.
0 votes
↳ nominated for a seat: https://example.org/ops-incident-review.pdf could not read it (HTTPError) 1 of 2 behind it
discussNobody trusts a correction if it comes from the other side
Narrower than it reads: this is about national politics only.
0 votesdiscussing (1)
Subscription walls put good reporting behind a price and left the rest free
4 votesdiscuss
Reach is sold, so the loudest account is not the most representative
0 votesdiscuss
Certainty is more comfortable than accuracy, and cheaper
0 votesdiscuss
The same event is reported as two different events
To be precise: this is about incentives, not anyone's character.
1 votesdiscuss
Local newspapers closed and nothing replaced them
1 votesdiscuss
Local life is thinner, so national politics fills the space
0 votesdiscuss
Where you live now predicts what you believe better than anything else
0 votesdiscuss
Schools do not teach how to read a source
To be precise: this is about incentives, not anyone's character.
0 votesdiscuss
The word 'misinformation' has become a way to dismiss people
1 votesdiscuss
Being informed is expensive in time and nobody budgets for it
0 votesdiscuss
Cheap sincerity beats expensive accuracy, and always has
0 votesdiscuss
The people most online are the least representative
0 votesdiscuss
Political parties benefit from the split and have no reason to fix it
I mean this as an observation, not a proposal.
0 votesdiscuss
People no longer meet anyone who disagrees with them in person
To be precise: this is about incentives, not anyone's character.
5 votesdiscuss
Disagreeing in public costs you socially, so most people stop
Scope: mainstream platforms, not niche forums.
12 votesdiscuss
Ranking optimises for time spent, not for being informed
Scope: mainstream platforms, not niche forums.
14 votesdiscuss
The feeling of being lied to came first; the bubbles came after
Scope: mainstream platforms, not niche forums.
0 votesdiscuss
Regulation moves in years and the products change in weeks
I mean this as an observation, not a proposal.
0 votesdiscuss
The people building this were not asked whether it should exist
0 votesdiscuss
There is no shared set of facts to argue from any more
To be precise: this is about incentives, not anyone's character.
2 votesdiscuss
Arguments online end in blocking, not in agreement
7 votesdiscuss
Moderation happens after the reach has already happened
5 votesdiscuss
Half the accounts arguing about this are not people
Narrower than it reads: this is about national politics only.
0 votesdiscuss
Ad money rewards volume of attention, not quality of it
13 votesdiscuss
It is not a bubble; most people are simply not interested in politics at all
Scope: mainstream platforms, not niche forums.
1 votesdiscuss
There is no button anywhere that says 'show me what I am missing'
0 votesdiscuss
Recommendation systems are not inspectable from outside
6 votesdiscuss
We measure engagement because it is easy to measure, not because it matters
1 votesdiscuss
A newsroom now costs more than the advertising it can sell
5 votesdiscuss
Working from home removed the last place people argued across lines
0 votesdiscuss
Nobody has ever shown that shared facts produced agreement, even when we had them
0 votesdiscuss
The problem is not what people believe but that believing has become an identity
11 votesdiscuss
The cheapest content to make is content about other content
I mean this as an observation, not a proposal.
0 votesdiscuss
The institutions that used to arbitrate lost their authority for their own reasons
0 votesdiscuss
A feed has no edges, so you cannot tell what you are not seeing
11 votesdiscuss
Loneliness makes online belonging worth more than accuracy
0 votesdiscuss
Outrage travels further than accuracy, so it is what gets made
Scope: mainstream platforms, not niche forums.
5 votesdiscuss
We remember the claim and forget that it was corrected
0 votesin focus ↑ · close ✕