THE QUESTION
Why do people like filter bubbles?
closed · back to Actions
Viewing as guest. Enter a handle to join and take part.
People no longer meet anyone who disagrees with them in person
To be precise: this is about incentives, not anyone's character.
Nothing said yet.
Twenty years ago the same complaint was made about television
Everyone assumes the other side is more extreme than it is
I would want evidence before I would call this a cause myself.
Nobody agrees on who should decide what is true
I mean this as an observation, not a proposal.
People choose the sources that already agree with them
cluster 2discussing (1)
Platforms are where politics happens, but nobody elected them
Scope: mainstream platforms, not niche forums.
Nobody trusts a correction if it comes from the other side
Narrower than it reads: this is about national politics only.
Subscription walls put good reporting behind a price and left the rest free
Reach is sold, so the loudest account is not the most representative
Certainty is more comfortable than accuracy, and cheaper
The same event is reported as two different events
To be precise: this is about incentives, not anyone's character.
Local newspapers closed and nothing replaced them
Local life is thinner, so national politics fills the space
Where you live now predicts what you believe better than anything else
Schools do not teach how to read a source
To be precise: this is about incentives, not anyone's character.
Correcting someone publicly makes them dig in harder
To be precise: this is about incentives, not anyone's character.
cluster 2discuss
The word 'misinformation' has become a way to dismiss people
People I know now live in two different versions of the same country
cluster 1discuss
Being informed is expensive in time and nobody budgets for it
Cheap sincerity beats expensive accuracy, and always has
The people most online are the least representative
Political parties benefit from the split and have no reason to fix it
I mean this as an observation, not a proposal.
People no longer meet anyone who disagrees with them in person
To be precise: this is about incentives, not anyone's character.
Disagreeing in public costs you socially, so most people stop
Scope: mainstream platforms, not niche forums.
Ranking optimises for time spent, not for being informed
Scope: mainstream platforms, not niche forums.
The feeling of being lied to came first; the bubbles came after
Scope: mainstream platforms, not niche forums.
Regulation moves in years and the products change in weeks
I mean this as an observation, not a proposal.
The people building this were not asked whether it should exist
Every platform is a private space that behaves like a public one
I would want evidence before I would call this a cause myself.
cluster 3discuss
There is no shared set of facts to argue from any more
To be precise: this is about incentives, not anyone's character.
Arguments online end in blocking, not in agreement
Moderation happens after the reach has already happened
Half the accounts arguing about this are not people
Narrower than it reads: this is about national politics only.
Ad money rewards volume of attention, not quality of it
It is not a bubble; most people are simply not interested in politics at all
Scope: mainstream platforms, not niche forums.
There is no button anywhere that says 'show me what I am missing'
Recommendation systems are not inspectable from outside
We measure engagement because it is easy to measure, not because it matters
A newsroom now costs more than the advertising it can sell
Working from home removed the last place people argued across lines
Nobody has ever shown that shared facts produced agreement, even when we had them
The problem is not what people believe but that believing has become an identity
The cheapest content to make is content about other content
I mean this as an observation, not a proposal.
The institutions that used to arbitrate lost their authority for their own reasons
A feed has no edges, so you cannot tell what you are not seeing
Loneliness makes online belonging worth more than accuracy
Being wrong in front of people you know is worse than being wrong
Meaning the ordinary user, not the committed activist.
cluster 1discuss
Outrage travels further than accuracy, so it is what gets made
Scope: mainstream platforms, not niche forums.
Public broadcasters are treated as one side rather than a floor
Scope: mainstream platforms, not niche forums.
cluster 3discuss
We remember the claim and forget that it was corrected