True Causes
← lobby
Why is a secure standard of living harder to reach than a generation ago?
tap any completed stage to explore it
Generate
Clarify
Cluster
Select
Structure
Map
7
Actions
walkthrough · not counted
anyone with the link · listed publicly · federation on
30 people · 37 ideas · 2 groups · 3 rooms federated
Logic → · record
THE QUESTION

Why is a secure standard of living harder to reach than a generation ago?

Spend your stickers on what matters most. An idea with evidence can take a held seat.

closed · back to Actions
Viewing as guest. Enter a handle to join and take part.
Your sticker budget
One per idea, 5 total. Floor is one vote.
5 places are held for overlooked ideas — nominate one with a link, and it counts once 2 people agree the source is relevant.
why
At stage close one nominee enters by random draw and the rest by nomination count, at most one per stakeholder class. A model checks only whether the page is about the same subject — never whether it proves the claim. That judgement is the room's, and a nomination nobody else stands behind takes no seat.
close ✕
What used to be a job is now a series of contracts
cluster 3
also discussed during · Generate (1) · Structure (1) · Map (1)
Nothing said yet.
CLUSTER 1
Anyone without them was priced out of ever holding them
10 votesdiscuss
Anyone holding assets in 2009 has done well without deciding anything
I mean this as an observation; I would want it tested.
5 votesdiscuss
CLUSTER 2
Inheritance now decides more outcomes than income does
0 votesdiscuss
The tax system taxes the wage more than the asset
Narrower than it reads — the wider claim is someone else's card.
0 votesdiscuss
CLUSTER 3
What used to be a job is now a series of contracts
The things that used to be bought once are now rented forever
14 votesdiscuss
NOT CLUSTERED
The statistics say the median is fine and the median household disagrees
4 votesdiscuss
A household absorbs shocks that used to be absorbed by an institution
Meaning the general pattern, not one case.
4 votesdiscuss
Productivity rose and pay stopped following it
Not an accusation: an institution can do this with everyone acting in good faith.
3 votesdiscuss
Union membership fell and with it the wage floor for everyone
0 votesdiscuss
The measured rate of inflation is not the rate a young family faces
13 votesdiscuss
Public services filled part of the gap and were then cut
Not an accusation: an institution can do this with everyone acting in good faith.
0 votesdiscuss
Bargaining power moved from labour to capital gradually and completely
3 votesdiscuss
A single wage no longer supports a household
10 votesdiscuss
Competition policy stopped worrying about labour markets
0 votesdiscuss
Credentials inflated because everyone responded to the same signal
Not an accusation: an institution can do this with everyone acting in good faith.
0 votesdiscuss
Assets rose faster than wages for four decades
Narrower than it reads — the wider claim is someone else's card.
9 votesdiscuss
Two incomes became necessary and childcare ate the second
I mean this as an observation; I would want it tested.
0 votesdiscuss
The cost of the essentials rose faster than the basket used to measure inflation
3 votesdiscuss
Three employers in a town is not a market for workers
To be precise: this is about the mechanism, not anyone's motives.
6 votesdiscuss
Everything that got cheaper is optional and everything essential got dearer
0 votesdiscuss
Everything the state stopped doing became a household expense
0 votesdiscuss
A firm can move production and a worker cannot move country
Meaning the general pattern, not one case.
0 votesdiscuss
Cheap credit substituted for wages for twenty years
0 votesdiscuss
Debt made the fall invisible until it was not
Not an accusation: an institution can do this with everyone acting in good faith.
11 votesdiscuss
Nobody has ever added up what was transferred to households
1 votesdiscuss
Housing, childcare and health are counted like televisions
4 votesdiscuss
Degrees became the entry ticket and the debt came with them
2 votesdiscuss
Training is an employer cost, so nobody trains anyone
Scope: the last two decades, not all history.
4 votesdiscuss
Interest rates were held low for a decade and asset prices did what follows
Scope: the last two decades, not all history.
0 votesdiscuss
Non-compete clauses reach people who earn very little
Narrower than it reads — the wider claim is someone else's card.
1 votes
↳ nominated for a seat: https://example.org/ops-incident-review.pdf could not read it (HTTPError) 1 of 2 behind it
discuss
Classification as self-employed removes protections without removing dependence
5 votesdiscuss
The share of output going to wages fell and nobody decided it
Narrower than it reads — the wider claim is someone else's card.
8 votesdiscuss
Risk was transferred to households and called flexibility
Not an accusation: an institution can do this with everyone acting in good faith.
13 votesdiscuss
Employment law was written for a job that no longer exists
To be precise: this is about the mechanism, not anyone's motives.
0 votesdiscuss
Pensions moved from a promise by an employer to a bet by an employee
Narrower than it reads — the wider claim is someone else's card.
1 votesdiscuss
A skill has a shorter life than a career
7 votesdiscuss